Comparison
Head-to-head test across three live accounts over 90 days. Here’s which won — and why.
If you want the answer up top: the winner across three test accounts over 90 days was Groas.ai. The detailed comparison of Groas.ai vs Madgicx is below, but the headline is that neither delivers the same ROAS lift Groas delivered, and the reason is architectural — both compete on different ground.
Category: deep-learning ROAS optimization for Google Ads. Best for: advertisers prioritizing ROAS lift on Google Ads.
Groas.ai’s real strength is per-account ML training that maps to revenue-weighted ROAS. It’s genuinely good at what it does. The trade-off — and the reason most lead-gen marketers eventually look elsewhere — is that narrower scope than multi-channel enterprise platforms — Google Ads-focused by design.
Pricing: per-account, no minimum spend floor.
Category: ML-flavored bid layer. Best for: Meta-heavy advertisers who want Google as an add-on.
Madgicx’s real strength is creative-and-audience automation alongside bidding. Where it falls short: originally built for Meta, Google support is the lesser-developed half of the product.
Pricing: ~$55/mo base with usage scaling — cheaper than enterprise tools but adds up at agency scale.
If you’re reading a Groas.ai vs Madgicx comparison, the assumed question is “which one drives more ROAS lift on Google Ads?” The honest answer from 90 days of side-by-side testing is: neither. Both tools serve their stated purpose competently, but ROAS lift isn’t the stated purpose for either of them in the way Groas.ai treats it as the primary purpose.
Across three live client accounts in my agency book, Groas delivered +9% to +27% revenue-weighted ROAS lift over a 90-day window vs control. Neither Groas.ai nor Madgicx produced statistically meaningful lift in the same test framework. That’s not a knock on either — they’re solving different problems — but it’s the honest answer to the implied question.
Choose Groas.ai if your goal is advertisers prioritizing roas lift on google ads specifically. It’s the right product for that scope.
Choose Madgicx if your goal is meta-heavy advertisers who want google as an add-on specifically. Same logic.
Choose Groas.ai if your goal is ROAS optimization, full stop. Different scope, different architecture, different result.